Darling acquiesces in return to debt-fuelled casino
August 2nd, 2009

Despite the bluster from politicians last October that banks would only qualify for bail-outs if they changed their ways — for example by lending more responsibly, curbing pay and bonuses, facing tougher regulation, etc, etc), the UK’s banking fraternity has put two fingers up to such talk.
Our craven chancellor of the exchequer, Alistair Darling, has caved in to their scaremongering, which has included hollow threats to move their businesses offshore, and shelved plans for radical reform.
Instead we’re getting a timid and confused hotchpotch of reforms, coupled with the occasional piece of theatre from the government which is likely to do very little to prevent future crises. The reforms proposed by shadow chancellor George Osborne are not much better.
With the media spotlight turned away — the MPs’ expenses scandal was a God send for the bankers here, as was Sir Fred Goodwin’s pension — the asset protection scheme, which is disastrous for the taxpayer, and Stephen Hester’s £9.6m remuneration package have either received minimal coverage or simply been waved through.
In a recent column in the Belfast Telegraph, Eamonn McCann wrote
“The banks, having worn diplomatic expressions of contrition for 10 minutes or so, are now sniggeringly scornful of those threats of tighter regulation … Goldman Sachs — described in the current issue of Rolling Stone as a “vampire squid sucking the face of humanity” — has set aside $11.4 billion for ‘employee compensation’ (bonuses) for the first half of this year, suggesting an average (average!) payout of $770,000 … The schmucks and chumps [by which McCann means us lot, the Great British taxpayer] have come up with the cash. Time to get back to business as usual. No need to feel chastened, no need for change.”
Many bankers have convinced themselves that, even though this crisis was of their own making and it has so far cost UK taxpayers £1.3 trillion, they should once again be left to their own devices and granted the freedom to drive us all into greater and greater debt as though nothing had changed. That’s gratitude for you!
They believe they must be let off the hook, even though it’s going to take several generations of UK taxpayers to pay off the debt pile the Labour government has accumulated in order to salvage what remains of the institutions and economies they have wrecked.
And Darling and his colleagues — apparently hell-bent on returning state-owned banks to the private sector as soon as humanly possible — have displayed economic illiteracy in their hankering for a return to the unsustainable pre-credit crunch finance industry. The agenda is to get property prices back onto an upwards spiral and once more give Britons the chimera of wealth. If they succeed, the next crash will of course be just around the corner. And it’s going to be even more painful than the last.
What infuriates me the most right now is the deception the banks are using on the government and the media to ensure they get their own way.
This week banks including Lloyds Banking Group, the proud owner of HBOS, are going to use every accounting ruse in the book — including booking one-off exceptionals such as gains from disposals, write-backs of subprime assets and gains from swapping junior for more senior debt — to give the impression they’ve recovered their poise and and are either already or soon to be profitable.
They are also, of course, abusing the oligopolistic position that they currently enjoy in the market to bump up prices. Thankfully, the European Commissioner Neelie Kroes is serious about tackling this market abuse.
Despite all this, I predict that, in underlying terms, banks like Lloyds and RBS will be heavily loss-making for some time. This is largely due to the second wave of bad debts and impairments that are occurring in the “real” economy. I suspect the massive corporate and retail loan books that they so injudiciously built up during the boom will continue to overhang their balance sheets for years to come (see Jane Croft’s article in the Weekend FT Reality will rain on sector’s parade).
It must also never be forgotten that the Labour administration intends to palm us, the British taxpayers, off with the burden of some £585bn of the bankers’ toxic waste — loans that are unlikely to get repaid and assets so opaque they’re actually worthless (these were the loans and deals on which the bonuses of people such as RBS’s Johnny Cameron and HBOS’s Peter Cummings depended) — through the inequitable and morally dubious asset protection scheme.
This has already been described by Paul Murphy of the FT as a scam, a “deceitful deal” designed to:-
“stamp all over the interests of British taxpayers – all in the name of retaining Lloyds’ status as a private entity listed on the London stock market …. The government is conniving to keep [Blank and Daniels] in their jobs, while at the same time allowing existing shareholders to cling on to the fantastical idea that their stock is actually worth something.”
Short URL: https://www.ianfraser.org/?p=885
“What infuriates me is the deception the banks appear to be using on the government and the media to ensure they get their own way.”
What infuriates me is the way the Government relies on that deception so that it doesn’t have to do anything about the financial scam that has been perpetrated on the entire Country. Mr Brown talks endlessly about ‘transparency’ – does he know what the word means? £585bn of toxic waste is about as transparent as it gets to everyone except for (you can’t see me) Gordon. And while we all live with the results of Gordon’s bank bailout, he and Alistair are letting the banks run up the next mountain of debt. Why? And where is the FSA this time?
Could it be that the next huge scandal will be the private deals done between some people in Government and the Masters Of The Universe? I heard a story last week – may or may not be true – that for one MP at least, funding was always just a phone call away with a friendly bank manager. Oh my goodness, has there been possible collusion between Government Ministers and banks? No, surely not?
Excellent article as always Mr Fraser and here’s a cheerful thought – I predict that the Lloyds/HBOS marriage will end in a very messy divorce in the very near future and Lloyds will be able to cite several million angry tax payers who can confirm that the adulterous HBOS has been endlessly screwing them as well.
[…] cash to shore up the damage, what did Brown do? He allowed the banks to revert to type, to continue gambling pretty much as they were before, indeed he ensure they had a virtually limitless supply of chips through quantitative easing. As […]