|

Paul Moore: if profit’s the only goal, people inevitably pursue improper means

October 30th, 2011

Calls for a radical rethink of the political and economic system from the “HBOS whistleblower”, Paul Moore, could not have come at a more appropriate time.

Moore — who was personally fired by HBOS chief executive Sir James Crosby in November 2004 after seeking to warn the bank’s board that its sales-mad culture, excessive risk-taking, and weak controls jeopardized not just the bank itself but also the wider financial system — makes his call as the global Occupy movement gains traction and as the decade known to former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan as the “Great Moderation” has been re-named “The decade Wall Street [and the City of London] went insane

Moore believes that, rather than seek a return to the narrow neo-liberalism which has proved so destructive, we should seek a new way of living in which ‘being’ and ‘feeling’ have as much prominence as ‘having’ and ‘doing’.

Moore quotes Colorado-based author Ken Wilbur, who has sought to expose the selfishness and egotism of the “baby boomer” generation. In his 2001 book A Brief History of Everything, Wilbur said humanity must come up with an alternative “integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality” strong enough to counterbalance the so-called big three – the “I”, the “We” and the “It””.

Here are Moore’s [edited] thoughts:-

“The reason the economy is in such a mess is because we have been living in a culture of “me, more, now” driven by secularism leading to materialism and consumerism and excusing moral relativism. Economics, despite loud protestations to the contrary, is often conducted without ethics. Greed and the love of money have taken over.

“The love of money and self now seems to be at the centre of everything we do. We (and I include myself in this) have become addicted to greed, pride, vanity, envy and excessive consumption. And the mass media paints this way of living – which is all about ‘having’ and ‘doing’ not ‘being’ and ‘feeling’ – as the only way to find freedom, peace and well-being. The credit card advert sums it up “take the waiting out of the wanting”, as does the cosmetics company advert that uses line “Because you’re worth it”.

“We still measure everything by the Holy Grail of GDP (money and growth) which Robert F. Kennedy once described as “measuring everything except what makes life worth living”…. I sometimes think we should re-name it “G Me P”!

“Far from being about freedom, the addictions to “me, more, now” lead to psychological slavery and must be abolished just as physical slavery was in the 19th century. Far from leading to well-being they lead to ill-being and an insatiable craving for more stuff.

“Economics without ethics leads to where we are now – at the culmination of a borrow to grow strategy that has turned out to be a giant Ponzi scheme which has mortgaged our children’s futures so we can live it up in the present and in a world in which, after 400 years of capitalism, the richest 1% of the planet own 40% of everything leaving only 1% for the poorest half.

“The $64,000 question is how do we get from the mess we are now in to a new paradigm about money, markets and economics that avoids both the pitfalls of communism and further unbridled capitalism? All I know is that when profit becomes the exclusive goal, it ultimately risks encouraging people to use improper means to obtain it, destroying the wealth of the majority for the benefit of the few and therefore creating poverty.”

Short URL: http://www.ianfraser.org/?p=5212

Posted by on Oct 30 2011. Filed under Blog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

3 Comments for “Paul Moore: if profit’s the only goal, people inevitably pursue improper means”

  1. One of the biggest problems / risks we face in the world today in effecting the change we so badly need is the fact that the so-called developed democracies of the world are massively over-influenced by vested interests. Jesse Norman, a new Tory MP, said on BBC Radio 4 recently that “lobbyists are like a canker on the body politic” and many people would agree.

    When the rich and powerful have excessive influence, we end up, not with “public policy” but “private interest policy”; think of the power exerted by the following lobbies – oil, weapons, financial services, pharmaceuticals.

    If we are going to have any chance of getting the policies that ordinary people know are right (e.g. CEOs of Banks we own not earning 280xs the average earnings!), we have got to deal with vested interest first. We could start by campaigning specifically for policies against vested interest e.g. no more private funding of political parties….etc.

  2. Sadly, if we set people up to believe they are worthy of 280 x the average salary and up to 500 times the salary of their secretary’s we are leaving the way clear for them to believe their thoughts and actions are hundreds of times more valuable than the people around them. With fear for their own livelihoods at risk (a risk that was proved very real by the board’s actions when Paul Moore refused to buy into the Emperor’s new clothes ethos) there is no incentive for those within the banking sector to encourage any change. This stranglehold over the masses has become the norm because the necessary changes are too unpalatable and far too lucrative for politcians, banks and the corporate elite alike to embrace. The “worship of me” will surely continue unless all those concerned have a simultaneous epiphany prompting them to step down from their long lived regal status. Can any of us really see this happening? http://lifeafterdebts.blogspot.com/2011/06/emporers-new-clothes.html

  3. Paul Moore was on the retail side i.e. mortgages as opposed to the corporate banking (sorry property “lending”) that actually destroyed what was Scotland’s oldest ever company. Presumably Caird Capital is of more interest these days?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login