<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is RBS getting value for money from its £200m annual legal bill? Doesn&#8217;t look like it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/</link>
	<description>Journalist, Blogger, Broadcaster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 08:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RBS SPENDS £200M PER YEAR TO KEEP ITS MANAGEMENT OUT OF PRISON + OTHER LEGAL MATTERS &#124; thewhistleblowers</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-98300</link>
		<dc:creator>RBS SPENDS £200M PER YEAR TO KEEP ITS MANAGEMENT OUT OF PRISON + OTHER LEGAL MATTERS &#124; thewhistleblowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfraser.org/?p=4822#comment-98300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBS v Matheson – a tale of David and Goliath &#171; MBM Commercial &#8211; Dispute Resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-96643</link>
		<dc:creator>RBS v Matheson – a tale of David and Goliath &#171; MBM Commercial &#8211; Dispute Resolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfraser.org/?p=4822#comment-96643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the amount of money currently being spent by RBS in legal proceedings against it, see here: http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/ Share this:FacebookTwitterEmailPrintMoreDiggRedditStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the amount of money currently being spent by RBS in legal proceedings against it, see here: <a href="http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ianfraser.org/a-200m-annual-legal-bill-doesnt-seem-to-have-shielded-rbs-from-justice/</a> Share this:FacebookTwitterEmailPrintMoreDiggRedditStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
